1. POSSESSION IS 9/10THS THE LAW: when there is no definitive proof of ownership, the person in possession of the item can keep it, by law. This "ownership" will remain in tact until it is proven otherwise. The term usually applies to property law. I and only I, and the people I invite, enter my passageway. No one comes to maintain it; it is my responsibility.

2. On 5/18/09, in Judge David Cohen's Court, you stood next to me as DHPD attorney told us that because of her aggressive behavior, landlord could not enter my entryway or any other area within my home to make repairs, the court's words, and I quote, ". . respondent agrees that none of the work entailed under the current order shall be conducted by the respondent, Ms. Aris personally." The work in question was that which was within my home. You tried at the time, to argue that the entryway was public property but the attorney shot you down, and landlord did indeed hire someone to make the repairs in my entryway. You had been told and knew that the entryway was private.

3. Over and above these arguments, is the irrefutable fact that I am responsible for the electricity in my entryway. You have broken into my home, Mr. Fernandez.

4. Is this harassment? Yes, and also criminal trespass. And I might add theft, as you walked off with my pot. With the entry door wide open, and me in my nightgown, what did you think you were doing? Especially considering your words in the 8/1/10 email, "This time application is by motion so I don't have to personally hand it to you . . "

5. You would like more litigation? Mr. Fernandez, truth must be said at this point. The process of going to court is costly and time consuming for me, as well as being stressful, and so it is too for your client, landlord Aris. There is only one person who is profiting in these court hearings, going about his work and collecting money. You have accused me many times of wasting the court's time with my many cases. But there was only one HP action that I brought to court. You kept the proceedings going on for months with many court appearances until I had no choice but to file contempt charges because your client was not obeying court orders. As for the harassment, you and your client have been harassing me from the beginning in hopes that you would drive me out of my home. "Why would you want to live in an apartment with mold in it?" said Ms. Aris in Judge Capella's court. There have been 4, 5 inspections to investigate the mold in my backyard, and the mold continued to grow. I was sick in court and pleading with you and your client to correct the problem, and the mold continued to grow.

5. There is much to learn, to be sure. I did discover that you erred when you stated, "Self represented parties are only (landlord will argue) entitled to costs." Please check Real Property Law 234 ŠTenant's Right to Recover Attorney's Fees in Actions or Summary Proceedings Arising out of Leases of Residential Property.

6. I have been asking for a rent stabilized lease since 11/9/09 and have yet to get a response. I cannot make a rent payment whose sum is unknown until I have a lease.

7. See point 6 above.

8. Considering the abusive last email you sent me, your harassing behavior, breaking into my home, stealing my property, the many demands for inspections that did not bear fruit, your request to examine something that is not visible, your lack of expertise in the matter, and since landlord is not interested in inspecting the premises herself, I will wait for the court to appoint someone, perhaps an HPD inspector, to conduct the investigation. You have abused your power, and I no longer feel safe with you.

On the Worktable